Sunday, June 24, 2012

Ethnomathematics, Accountability, and Sustanbility


Riana Sinta Dewi
09313244022

Refleksi:
Ethnomathematics, Accountability, and Sustanbility
Dr. Marsigit, MA

            Cocroft in Gloria Gilmer, the following definition of Ethnomathematics has been prepared for a dictionary of multicultural education:
(1) Ethnomathematics is the study of the mathematical practices of specific cultural groups in the course of dealing with their environmental problems and activities; For example, the manner in professional basketball players estimate angles and distances differs greatly from the corresponding manner used by truck drivers. Both professional basketball players and truck drivers are identifiable cultural groups that use mathematics in their daily work. They have their own language and specific ways of obtaining these estimates and ethnomathematicians study their techniques.
            The prefix 'ethno' refers to identifiable cultural groups, such as national-tribal societies, labor groups, children of a certain age bracket, professional classes, etc. and includes their ideologies, language, daily practices, and their specific ways of reasoning and inferring.
            'Mathema' here means to explain, understand and manage reality specifically by ciphering, counting, measuring, classifying, ordering, inferring and modeling patterns arising in the environment.
The suffix 'tics' means art or technique.
(2) Thus, ethnomathematics is the study of mathematical techniques used by identifiable cultural groups in understanding, explaining, and managing problems and activities arising in their own environment.
            As a research area, “Ethnomathematics” is often defined as the research on the relationship between mathematics (mathematics education) and the corresponding social and cultural backgrounds, namely the research to show “how is mathematics produced, transferred, diffused and specialized in diverse cultural systems” (Weizhong Zhang and Qinqiong Zhang, 2010 : 152)

            The term “account” entails giving a report on, furnishing a justifying analysis or explanation, providing a statement of explanation of one’s conduct, offering a statement or exposition of reasons, causes, grounds, or motives, or simply providing a statement of facts or events (Kenneth Leithwood, 2005:10)
            Brundtland definition of sustanbility , which states:
“Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
        
        We can divide education problem into 2, accountablelity and sustanbility. We should have an accountablelity to be trusted other people. If we don’t have accountablelity, we like crazy people. And sustanbility, it is like main food, if Indonesian people is rice, contunity.
            The prior knowledge and basic understanding of mathematics are logic and experience.
            If we talk about the deep of mathematics, we talk about education but it’s just basic knowledge because we have phylosophy or ontology as the nature of education. And the base of it are logic and experince.
            And if we talk about the up of mathematics we talk about evidence and the uppest is spiritual that known as spiritual knowledge.

REFERENCES
Gloria Gilmer. A Definition of Ethnomathematics .International Study Group on Ethnomathematics (ISGEm) Newsletter, Volume 11, Number 1, December 1995. Located at:http://web.nmsu.edu/~pscott/isgem111.htm.
Kenneth Leithwood. 2005. Educational Accountability Issues and Alternatives.Saskatchewan

Weizhong Zhang and Qinqiong Zhang.2010. Ethnomathematics and Its Integration within the Mathematics Curriculum. China :Journal of Mathematics Education.

The Realationship Between Ethnomathematics and Mathematics Education


Riana Sinta Dewi
09313244022
Reflection:
The Realationship Between Ethnomathematics and Mathematics Education
Dr. Marsigit

            We know that mathematics split into 2, there are pure mathematics and mathematics eduacation. Pure mathematics known as mathematics and mathematics education known as school mathematics.
            Mathematics is a deductive science because we starting from definition, developing theorem, axiom to produce another theorem. If we talk about the realtionship between mathematics and ethnomathematics so the result is there isn’t because mathematician say that:
-          Mathematics is free of culture and value.
It means that there isn’t intersection between mathematics and culture, value (ethnomathematics).
-          Mathematics just for mathematics.
It means that mathematics is close science. Mathematics is closed from others science.
-          If mathematics with etnomathematics so it isn’t mathematics.

School mathematics is mathematics for school. If in mathematics (pure mathematics) the subject is mathematician, in school mathematics the subject is student. The paradigm of school mathematics is not to make a theorem but how to construct students’ own knowledge.
Cocroft in Marsigit, the characteristics of school mathematics according to Ebbutt and Straker (1995: 10-63) include: 
-          Mathematics as search activity patterns and relationships .
-          Mathematics as a creativity that requires imagination, intuition and invention.
-          Mathematics as problem solving activities (problem solving) 
-          Mathematics as a tool to communicate          
            The different between pure mathematics and Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora is if in pure mathematics definition is main basic and it lies at the beginning. But in  Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora; make definition will be dangerous because definition make a boundary. If there is definition in Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora, it is not definition but descriptive or category, criteria againts something and it is located at the end.
            We must remember that pure mathematics is not equal to pure mathematics because in school mathematics wiil be interact with students but in pure mathematics not.
            If we talk the relationship between ethnomathematics and mathematics education in space/context/culture/critilization and time so it is large area. Because we use mathematics in our society and the society must have the culture. So instantly mathematics and culture will be interact in society .
            Based on space/context/culture/critilization, we have object, subject, method, product. The soft example are ideas, believe (habit), theories, paradigm (rule), and philosophy. And the hard example are artifact, monument, and book.
            Based on time, we have the abstraction about what, who, why, where, and for what. And they are always be question with mathematics education.
            Based on where, we have several good academic place. they are there in Paris, Bangkok, Nederland  (RME) , Italy (Pisa), Japan, USA (NCTM).
            Based on the Geography there are North Usa, East Asia, South Asia,Nest Europe, Africa, Middle Ero-Asia, Australia.
            Based on antropology, we have big cities, rural area, remotearea, isolated area. Based on where, we have specific etnomath such as street math in Brazil, Ritual math in Yogyakarta, and spiritual math. Based on abstract( geographic), we have liberal democracy (USA), democracy (Indonesia), and Industri.
            All of this came from Archaic to Triibal to Traditional to Feudal to Modern to Post Moden and to Contemporer.

Reference:
Marsigit. Asumsi Dasar Karakteristik Matematika, Subyek Didik dan Belajar Matematika Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika Berbasis Kompetensi Di SMP


Riana Sinta Dewi
09313244022
Reflection of
ETHNOMATHEMATICS:
The Relationship Between Ethno and Mathematics.
by Dr. Marsigit

            Relating to etymology, “Ethnomathematics” can be split to two word ethno and mathematics. Thus, that word refers to two different fields -anthropology and mathematics- so we can use two different field to review “Ethnomathematics”. 
           
            The word-initial “ethno” is part of the word “ethnology” which is defined as “the science that analyzes and compares human cultures” or “cultural anthropology”. And from the dictionary, the definition of “mathematics” is “a science dealing with ‘quantitative relations’ and ‘spatial forms’ in the real world”. So from that we can expect that there is cross point between culture and mathematics.   

            Ethnomathematics can be culture of mathematics, mathematics culture, to enculture of mathematics, and the context (social) of mathematics.
           
            If we see ethnomathematics from the chart of knowledge of, ethnomathematics is knowledge of mathematics and socialogy. Ethnomathematics need context. The context can be formal mathematics, model of mathematics, model of concrete, and concrete (example).

            As a research area, “Ethnomathematics” is often defined as the research on the relationship between mathematics (mathematics education) and the corresponding social and cultural backgrounds, namely the research to show “how is mathematics produced, transferred, diffused and specialized in diverse cultural systems” (Weizhong Zhang and Qinqiong Zhang, 2010 : 152)

            If we talk ethnomathematics as a research so we need the theories (references), to uncover, to collect data or to investigate or to research, to develope, to construct the world of, and the theories (references) again. And when we talk the first refences, we must talk about D’Ambrosio and Theresia Nun (street mathematics). Beacause they are the first people talk / search ethnomathematics. (Tamsin Meaney, Uenuku Fairhill, Tony Trinick ,2008) D’Ambrosio who is considered by many as the ‘father of ethnomathematics’ (Stillman & Balatti, 2000) described a research programme in ethnomathematics as ‘the study of the generation, organisation, transmission, dissemination and the use of jargons, codes, styles of reasoning, practices, results and methods’ (D’Ambrosio, 1992, p. 1183).

            The research of etnomathematics also need a method. The method is Hermeneutics. Etnomathematics research can be descriptive and qualitative research. It can done from recording, transcription, catagorization, analyze and theory. Usually the result is classroom action research or PTK in Indonesia.

            We also can etnomathematics in daily life such as Most African peoples south of the Sahara traditionally build houses with circular or rectangular bases (Weizhong Zhang and Qinqiong Zhang, 2010 : 153).

            We also can see the example of etnomathematics in Indonesia, there are:
1.      The role of mathematics in Yogyakarta palace.
2.      The role of mathematics in Javanese culture.
3.      The role of mathematics in “wayang” culture.
4.      The role of mathematics in “gamelan” culture.
5.      The role of mathematics on Javanise “primbon”.
6.      The relation of mathematics and forecasting.
7.      The role of mathematics in Javanese calender.
8.      The role mathematics in fengshui.
9.      The relation of mathematics and horoscope.





REFERENCES
Weizhong Zhang and Qinqiong Zhang.2010. Ethnomathematics and Its Integration within the Mathematics Curriculum. China :Journal of Mathematics Education.
Tamsin Meaney, Uenuku Fairhill, Tony Trinick.2008. The Role of Language in Ethnomathematics. Australia: The Journal of Mathematics and Culture.
           
           


























Friday, March 2, 2012

Assignment of Design of Math instruction 1 How to Develop Mathematics Instructional Design



How to Develop Mathematics Instructional Design

Riana Sinta Dewi (09313244022)
International Mathematics Edu ‘09

            Cocroft Mr. Marsigit the task of teacher is not easy and as innovative teacher of mathematics, we must always strive to help students to like math. As for the constraints of teachers, among others, a lack of understtanding of the meaning of theory, how to apply, the existing system, environmental conditions, learning facilities, how to develop the technology learning mathematics, how to handle differences in mathematical abilities of their students. While the target of achieving a high UAN and to achieve the syllabus are the two main factors why the teacher seemed to have no other alternative except to rely exposition methods  on mathematics teaching . And it is this which causes the student does not like math.
            Cocroft Mr. Marsigit many things can be done to change the paradigm, one of them by developing the design of learning mathematics. Instructional design is a systematic approach to course development that ensures that specific learning goals are accomplished. It is an iterative process that requires ongoing evaluation and feedback. Cocroft Report recommends some variation of learning (1982: 132) : method of exposition by the teacher, the methods of discussion, between teachers and students and between students and students, methods of solving problems (problem solving), methods of discovery (investigation), methods of basic training skills and principles, methods of implementation.
            Cocroft Mr. Marsigit by considering the nature of mathematics, the nature of  studying mathematics, the nature of  students learn  mathematics and its implications for the development of instructional design. Implementation of design that can be done by teachers, among others, consists of the preparation phase of teaching, learning phase, evaluation phase,evaluate yourself. Development of mathematical learning design needs to pay attention to / to promote a new paradigm:

Teacher Centered => Student Centered
Transfer of knowledge => Cognitive Dev.
Authoritarian => Democratic
Teachers Initiative  => Students Initiative
Passive Students => Active Students 
Exposition => Variations Methods, tools, approaches
Absolutist Mathematics =>  School Mathematics
Abstract, Memory => Concrete, Understanding, Application
Very formal => Little Informal
Sentralistic => Autonomy
Highly Structured => Flexible
            Teacher also need to managing and developing the teaching learning process of mathematics such as lesson plan, student worksheet, learning resources, apperseption, various methods of teaching, teaching aids, scheme of interaction, small group discussion, student presentation or reflection, the cognitive scheme, students conclusion and assesment.
            But in this section i will reflex about student worksheet, scheme of interaction, small group discussion, student presentation or reflection.
1.      Developing Students’ Worksheet
There is paradigm that to learn mathematics is to do mathematics. And to do mathematics, students need facilities. Students’ worksheet is one of tool to do mathematics. remember that student’s worksheet is not only a set of problem, it is absolutly wrong. The criteria of good students’ worksheet: students can construct their own knowledge of mathermatics, that  promote the teacher can  apply discovery method.
            There are two kinds of student worksheet (LKS), which was developed in learning at school[1]:
-          Student Worksheet unstructured is the sheet that contains the means for the subject matter, as an aid activity learners are used to convey a lesson. LKS is a teaching tool that can be used to accelerate learning, encouraging learning in each individual, contains little hint, in writing or verbally to direct work on the learner.
-          Structured student worksheets is contain information, examples and tasks. LKS is designed to guide learners in a work program or subjects, with little or no help coaches to achieve learning objectives. 
(Indrianto, 1998:14-17).
                        There are four steps in developing the students’ worksheet:
a.       Determining the instructional aims by analyzing the students by identify who are our students, knowing the character of our students.
b.      Collects the materials that we need based on instructional aims.
c.       Arranging the students worksheet, at least there are materials, taks, and exercies.
d.      Checking the students worksheet, it is consistent with the instructional aim or not.

2.      Developing and Implementing Scheme of Interactions ( Interaction between Teacher and Student, Student and Teacher)
To interact with students, there are three types of interaction that teachers should do,
1.      Whole class : the teachers give some problems to the students in class, then the teachers give a chance to the students to answer the problems.
2.      Small Group : teacher dividing the class into some small group, and then the students discuss the material in groups. Teacher monitoring each group and help to solve the problem in each group (only give some clue about the answer).
3.      Developing and Implementing Small Group Discussion
            How to do make small discussion:
-          Make small group within 3-5 person.
-          The students discuss the material in group.
-          The teacher as fasilitator and help the difficulty of student in discussion.
-          The teacher as a leader of all discussion in class.
                        The expected learning outcomes of implementing small group discussion are to compare the perceptions of all individuals about the material who may different each other; comparing the interpretation and the information obtained by each individual can improve mutual understanding, perception, information, interpretation, so that mistakes can be avoided.
                        Disscussion is one of teaching method that is more suitable and necessary if teachers would provide an oppotunity to students to express their abilities, critical thinking, assessing its role in the discussion, looking at the problem from their own experience and lesson learned in school, motivating, and examine further.
  The role to be played the teacher as a discussion leader, is the following:
a.         Initiating, which suggest new ideas or new ways of seeing issues being discussed.
b.         Seeking information, which asks the relevant facts.
c.         Giving information, namely the relevant facts or linking the subject of discussion with personal experiences of participants.
d.        Giving opinions, which gives an opinion on the subject under consideration.
e.         Clarifying, namely to reformulate the statement of someone; clarify the statement of someone a member.
f.          Elaborating, namely to develop a person's statement or give an example or application.
g.         Controlling, which ensures that the speech turn evenly; ensure that members who need to talk, get their turn to speak.
h.         Setting Standards, which provide or request a group setting, the criteria for assessing contribution members.
i.           Harmonizing, which reduce levels of tension that occurs in the discussion.
j.           Relieving tension, ie, applying the treatment after the occurrence of voltage.
k.         Coordinating, which concludes the main ideas that arose in discussion, helping the group develop the idea.
l.           Orientating, which deliver position that has been achieved in the group discussion and direct the discussion next trip.
m.       Testing, assessing the opinions and views towards straightening should be achieved.
n.         Consensus Testing, assess level agreements reached and to avoid differences of opinion.
o.         Summarizing, which summarizes the agreements reached.
4.      Developing and Implementing Students’ Presentation / Reflection
            Reflection is an activity with intensive listening back to the learning experience. Students are given the freedom to reflect. Through reflection, students try to : Understand the process, problems, issues, and constraints were evident in strategic action, taking into account the various perspectives that may exist in learning class situation ; Understand the issues of learning and the classroom situation where leraning implemented. Presentation method is a method of expression of ideas, feelings in public by one or more presenter to include paper or not. The goal is to train students to develop writing and speaking skills and how to think critically and analitically.