Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Realationship Between Ethnomathematics and Mathematics Education


Riana Sinta Dewi
09313244022
Reflection:
The Realationship Between Ethnomathematics and Mathematics Education
Dr. Marsigit

            We know that mathematics split into 2, there are pure mathematics and mathematics eduacation. Pure mathematics known as mathematics and mathematics education known as school mathematics.
            Mathematics is a deductive science because we starting from definition, developing theorem, axiom to produce another theorem. If we talk about the realtionship between mathematics and ethnomathematics so the result is there isn’t because mathematician say that:
-          Mathematics is free of culture and value.
It means that there isn’t intersection between mathematics and culture, value (ethnomathematics).
-          Mathematics just for mathematics.
It means that mathematics is close science. Mathematics is closed from others science.
-          If mathematics with etnomathematics so it isn’t mathematics.

School mathematics is mathematics for school. If in mathematics (pure mathematics) the subject is mathematician, in school mathematics the subject is student. The paradigm of school mathematics is not to make a theorem but how to construct students’ own knowledge.
Cocroft in Marsigit, the characteristics of school mathematics according to Ebbutt and Straker (1995: 10-63) include: 
-          Mathematics as search activity patterns and relationships .
-          Mathematics as a creativity that requires imagination, intuition and invention.
-          Mathematics as problem solving activities (problem solving) 
-          Mathematics as a tool to communicate          
            The different between pure mathematics and Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora is if in pure mathematics definition is main basic and it lies at the beginning. But in  Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora; make definition will be dangerous because definition make a boundary. If there is definition in Etnograph, pyshchology, and humaniora, it is not definition but descriptive or category, criteria againts something and it is located at the end.
            We must remember that pure mathematics is not equal to pure mathematics because in school mathematics wiil be interact with students but in pure mathematics not.
            If we talk the relationship between ethnomathematics and mathematics education in space/context/culture/critilization and time so it is large area. Because we use mathematics in our society and the society must have the culture. So instantly mathematics and culture will be interact in society .
            Based on space/context/culture/critilization, we have object, subject, method, product. The soft example are ideas, believe (habit), theories, paradigm (rule), and philosophy. And the hard example are artifact, monument, and book.
            Based on time, we have the abstraction about what, who, why, where, and for what. And they are always be question with mathematics education.
            Based on where, we have several good academic place. they are there in Paris, Bangkok, Nederland  (RME) , Italy (Pisa), Japan, USA (NCTM).
            Based on the Geography there are North Usa, East Asia, South Asia,Nest Europe, Africa, Middle Ero-Asia, Australia.
            Based on antropology, we have big cities, rural area, remotearea, isolated area. Based on where, we have specific etnomath such as street math in Brazil, Ritual math in Yogyakarta, and spiritual math. Based on abstract( geographic), we have liberal democracy (USA), democracy (Indonesia), and Industri.
            All of this came from Archaic to Triibal to Traditional to Feudal to Modern to Post Moden and to Contemporer.

Reference:
Marsigit. Asumsi Dasar Karakteristik Matematika, Subyek Didik dan Belajar Matematika Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika Berbasis Kompetensi Di SMP

No comments:

Post a Comment